1966 Ford Mustang vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1974 Volvo 140 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (170 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Mustang | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 140 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6385 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
