1966 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Buick Century
To start off, 1995 Buick Century is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1995 Buick Century. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Buick Century.
Because 1966 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Buick Century (180 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 1995 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Mustang | 1995 Buick Century | |
Make | Ford | Buick |
Model | Mustang | Century |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6385 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2662 mm |