1966 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Ford Triton

To start off, 1998 Ford Triton is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Triton weights approximately 53 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.

Because 1966 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Triton (174 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 1998 Ford Triton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang. 1966 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1998 Ford Triton has manual transmission. 1998 Ford Triton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: