1966 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip

To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Mustang weights approximately 299 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications: