1966 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 331 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Mustang | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6385 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.9 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 74 L |
