1966 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 207 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Mustang | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | Tribute |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6385 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.9 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 62 L |