1966 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Xedos 9
To start off, 2004 Xedos 9 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2004 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Xedos 9 weights approximately 406 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Xedos 9 (212 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Xedos 9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Mustang | 2004 Xedos 9 | |
| Make | Ford | Xedos |
| Model | Mustang | 9 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6385 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 212 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2760 mm |
