1966 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 383 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda CR-V (190 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Mustang | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Mustang | CR-V |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6385 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 1562 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 58 L |