1966 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 320 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1364 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Ford Mustang 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
Make Ford Chevrolet
Model Mustang Suburban
Year Released 1966 2010
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6385 cc 5300 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 320 HP 320 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 85 Nm 454 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1179 kg 2543 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 5649 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 2009 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1951 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 3302 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 117 L