1966 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Ram. (310 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1139 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Mustang | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Mustang | Ram |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6385 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 447 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 2318 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1908 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3569 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 98 L |