1966 Ford Taunus vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1966 Ford Taunus is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Taunus (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Taunus weights approximately 230 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 1962 Mini MK I | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Taunus | MK I |
Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2040 mm |