1966 Ford Taunus vs. 1965 Mitsubishi 500
To start off, 1966 Ford Taunus is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 1,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Taunus (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Taunus weights approximately 315 kg more than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 1965 Mitsubishi 500 | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Taunus | 500 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 23 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2070 mm |