1966 Ford Taunus vs. 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 225 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Taunus | Sigma |
Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2520 mm |