1966 Ford Taunus vs. 1990 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 330 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 1990 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Taunus | Sundance |
Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2470 mm |