1966 Ford Taunus vs. 1997 Acura EL
To start off, 1997 Acura EL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura EL weights approximately 234 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 1997 Acura EL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Taunus | EL |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2619 mm |