1966 Ford Taunus vs. 2002 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus.
Because 1966 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 2002 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Taunus | Neon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2650 mm |