1966 Ford Taunus vs. 2002 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK weights approximately 725 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 2002 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Taunus | XK |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |