1966 Ford Taunus vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 640 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Taunus | Omega |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |