1966 Ford Taunus vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 3 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus.
Because 1966 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |