1966 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 957 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Taunus | STS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1802 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |