1966 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 233 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Taunus | XF |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 271 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |