1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Zephyr (113 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 130 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Zephyr (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Zephyr | 2000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.4 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |