1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 1969 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1969 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Zephyr (126 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1969 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1969 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 136 kg more than 1969 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Zephyr (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 NSU Ro 80. (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 1969 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Ford | NSU |
Model | Zephyr | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 82 L |