1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 1977 Audi 80
To start off, 1977 Audi 80 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Zephyr (88 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1977 Audi 80. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1977 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 338 kg more than 1977 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Zephyr (167 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Audi 80. (112 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 1977 Audi 80 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Zephyr | 80 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 8.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2550 mm |