1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2001 Audi TT
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (161 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (88 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi TT weights approximately 60 kg more than 1966 Ford Zephyr. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (167 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2001 Audi TT | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Zephyr | TT |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2430 mm |