1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (105 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (180 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2002 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Zephyr | Continental |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 410 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 571 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |