1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 738 more horse power than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (105 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 214 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 810 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (180 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Lotec |
Model | Zephyr | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1150 mm |