1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,703 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Zephyr (72 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 366 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Zephyr (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Zephyr | R2 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1703 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 30 L |