1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (126 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Zephyr | Colt |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 95 L |