1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (126 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Zephyr | XJ |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 90.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 85 L |