1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 885 kg more than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL (900 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 733 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (167 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Zephyr | CL |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 900 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | TBD |
Top Speed | 153 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5106 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2139 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2955 mm |