1966 Ford Zephyr vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 55 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Zephyr (167 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Zephyr | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Zephyr | Roadster |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2467 mm |