1966 Holden EH vs. 1970 Renault 4
To start off, 1970 Renault 4 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1970 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1970 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden EH weights approximately 535 kg more than 1970 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden EH | 1970 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | EH | 4 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
