1966 Holden EH vs. 1971 Volvo 140
To start off, 1971 Volvo 140 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1971 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1971 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Volvo 140 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1971 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | EH | 140 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |