1966 Holden EH vs. 1972 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1972 Nissan Cedric is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Nissan Cedric (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 135 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1972 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | EH | Cedric |
Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |