1966 Holden EH vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 1973 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1973 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | EH | UTE |
Year Released | 1966 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 5047 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |