1966 Holden EH vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1979 Toyota Celica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden EH weights approximately 5 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EH | Celica |
Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |