1966 Holden EH vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden EH (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 5 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden EH | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EH | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |
