1966 Holden EH vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 1983 Mazda 929 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden EH weights approximately 35 kg more than 1983 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EH | 929 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |