1966 Holden EH vs. 1986 Ford Meteor
To start off, 1986 Ford Meteor is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1986 Ford Meteor. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Meteor.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Meteor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Meteor. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Meteor.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1986 Ford Meteor | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | EH | Meteor |
Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |