1966 Holden EH vs. 1997 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 1997 Nissan El Grand is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 785 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1966 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1997 Nissan El Grand has manual transmission. 1997 Nissan El Grand will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1997 Nissan El Grand | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | EH | El Grand |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |