1966 Holden EH vs. 1998 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1998 Nissan Cima is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan Cima weights approximately 351 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 1998 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | EH | Cima |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |