1966 Holden EH vs. 2000 Honda J-VX
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda J-VX (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 280 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2000 Honda J-VX | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | EH | J-VX |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 999 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1465 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |