1966 Holden EH vs. 2001 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2001 Mazda Tribute is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 600 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 2001 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Tribute (271 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden EH | 2001 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EH | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
