1966 Holden EH vs. 2001 Nissan Chappo
To start off, 2001 Nissan Chappo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,953 cc, 2001 Nissan Chappo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Chappo (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Chappo weights approximately 100 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Chappo (359 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Chappo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2001 Nissan Chappo | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | EH | Chappo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2953 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |