1966 Holden EH vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (244 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EH | 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 244 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |