1966 Holden EH vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 715 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH. 1966 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden EH | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Holden | SsangYong |
| Model | EH | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2874 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2830 mm |
