1966 Holden EH vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden EH weights approximately 56 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EH | 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |