1966 Holden EH vs. 2007 Saturn Vue
To start off, 2007 Saturn Vue is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Saturn Vue (172 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Vue should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Vue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Saturn Vue. (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Saturn Vue.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden EH | 2007 Saturn Vue | |
| Make | Holden | Saturn |
| Model | EH | Vue |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |
