1966 Holden EH vs. 2009 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Sequoia (272 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Sequoia (315 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2009 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EH | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |